Metallurgy Fundamentals
The science behind the engineering: phase diagrams (Fe-C, Al-Cu), crystal structures (BCC/FCC/HCP), grain size and the Hall-Petch relationship, TTT/CCT diagrams, solidification and casting metallurgy, and fractography โ understanding why materials behave the way they do.
A phase diagram maps the stable phases of a material at each temperature and composition. Every heat treatment decision starts here.
Key phases:
โข Ferrite (ฮฑ) โ BCC, soft, magnetic, max 0.022%C at 727ยฐC
โข Austenite (ฮณ) โ FCC, non-magnetic, max 2.14%C at 1147ยฐC
โข Cementite (FeโC) โ 6.67%C, hard and brittle
โข Pearlite โ lamellar mix of ferrite + cementite (0.76%C)
Critical temperatures:
โข A1 = 727ยฐC โ eutectoid (pearlite โ austenite)
โข A3 = 727-912ยฐC โ ferrite disappears (depends on %C)
โข Acm = austenite + cementite boundary
โข 1147ยฐC โ eutectic (liquid โ austenite + cementite)
>2.14%C = Cast Iron โ castable, brittle (gray) or ductile (SG)
Hypo-eutectoid (<0.76%C): ferrite + pearlite. Softer, more ductile. Most structural steels (1018, 4130).
Eutectoid (0.76%C): 100% pearlite. Balanced strength/hardness.
Hyper-eutectoid (>0.76%C): pearlite + cementite network. Harder but brittle. Tool steels, bearings (52100).
Rule of thumb: more carbon โ harder but less ductile and harder to weld.
Solvus line: the solubility limit of Cu in Al drops sharply with temperature โ this is the key to age hardening:
1. Solution treat (~500ยฐC) โ dissolve all Cu into solid solution
2. Quench โ trap Cu atoms in supersaturated solution
3. Age (natural or artificial at 120-190ยฐC) โ Cu precipitates form, blocking dislocations โ strength increases
T6 temper: solution treated + artificially aged = peak strength
Over-aging: precipitates coarsen โ strength decreases
โข Austenitic (304, 316): FCC, non-magnetic, cannot be hardened by heat treatment
โข Ferritic (430): BCC, magnetic, no phase transformation
โข Martensitic (410, 440C): hardenable, magnetic
โข Duplex (2205): 50/50 austenite + ferrite โ best of both worlds
โข PH (17-4PH): martensitic + precipitation hardening
Sensitization (danger!): 450-850ยฐC โ Cr carbides form at grain boundaries โ Cr-depleted zone โ intergranular corrosion. Solution anneal at 1050ยฐC+ to fix.
The atomic arrangement determines everything: ductility, strength, slip systems, and why some metals are easy to form while others crack.
Atoms per unit cell: 2
Packing factor: 68%
Slip systems: 48 (but only 12 active at room temp)
Behavior: strong, less ductile than FCC. Has a ductile-to-brittle transition temperature (DBTT) โ a critical concern for cold-weather structures (ships, bridges, pipelines).
Key fact: ferritic steels become brittle below DBTT. This caused the Liberty Ships fractures in WWII.
Atoms per unit cell: 4
Packing factor: 74%
Slip systems: 12 (all active at room temp)
Behavior: excellent ductility and formability. No DBTT โ stays ductile even at cryogenic temperatures.
Why austenitic stainless steel is used for cryogenic: FCC structure doesn't become brittle at -196ยฐC (LNโ). Ferritic/martensitic steels would shatter.
Atoms per unit cell: 6
Packing factor: 74% (same as FCC)
Slip systems: 3 basal (very few!)
Behavior: limited ductility, strong texture dependence (anisotropic). Harder to form than FCC or BCC metals.
Why Mg is hard to form at room temp: only 3 slip systems. Needs 200-300ยฐC to activate pyramidal slip โ warm forming required. Same issue (less severe) for titanium.
Iron:
โข Room temp โ 912ยฐC: BCC (ferrite)
โข 912ยฐC โ 1394ยฐC: FCC (austenite)
โข 1394ยฐC โ 1538ยฐC: BCC (delta ferrite)
Titanium:
โข <882ยฐC: HCP (alpha)
โข >882ยฐC: BCC (beta)
Why this matters: when austenite (FCC) is quenched fast enough, it can't transform back to ferrite โ instead it forms martensite (BCT), which is the hardest phase in steel.
Smaller grains = higher strength AND higher toughness. One of the few strengthening mechanisms that improves both simultaneously.
| ASTM G | Avg. diameter (ฮผm) | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| 1-3 | 200-100 | As-cast, annealed slowly |
| 4-6 | 90-45 | Normalized steel, general |
| 7-9 | 32-16 | Q&T steel, fine-grained |
| 10-12 | 11-6 | Micro-alloyed, HSLA |
| 13-14 | 4-3 | SPD, nanocrystalline |
โข ฯ_y = yield strength
โข ฯโ = friction stress (lattice resistance)
โข k = Hall-Petch slope (material constant)
โข d = average grain diameter
Implication: halving the grain diameter increases yield strength by ~41% (โ2 factor). This is why normalizing (air cool from austenite) produces finer grain and higher strength than slow furnace cooling (annealing).
2. Controlled rolling: finish rolling below recrystallization temperature โ pancaked austenite โ more nucleation sites โ finer ferrite grain.
3. Normalizing: heat to 30-50ยฐC above A3, air cool โ finer and more uniform grain than as-rolled.
4. Severe plastic deformation (SPD): ECAP, HPT โ nanocrystalline grain (G > 14). Research/specialty.
When it happens:
โข Welding HAZ (heat-affected zone) โ the #1 concern
โข Over-soaking during heat treatment
โข Hot forging at excessive temperature
Prevention: micro-alloying (Nb, V, Ti), controlled soaking time, correct austenitizing temperature (not higher than needed).
Phase diagrams tell you what phases are stable. TTT/CCT diagrams tell you what phases you actually get at a given cooling rate.
How to read it: start from austenite temperature, drop vertically to a holding temperature, read the time to start/finish transformation.
Regions (from top to bottom):
โข Pearlite nose: ~540ยฐC โ fastest diffusion-based transformation
โข Bainite bay: 250-540ยฐC โ needle-like, strong
โข Ms line: ~300ยฐC (for 0.4%C) โ martensite start
โข Mf line: ~200ยฐC โ martensite finish
To get martensite: must cool fast enough to miss the pearlite nose entirely.
Reading CCT: overlay a cooling curve on the diagram. Where it crosses the transformation boundaries โ that's the microstructure you get.
Slow cool (furnace): crosses pearlite region โ soft, annealed
Medium cool (air/oil): may produce pearlite + bainite mix
Fast cool (water): misses nose โ martensite
Critical cooling rate: the minimum cooling rate to get 100% martensite โ depends heavily on alloy content. Plain carbon steel needs very fast water quench; 4340 can be oil-quenched (alloys shift the nose right).
Properties:
โข Extremely hard (up to 65+ HRC for high-carbon steel)
โข Very brittle in as-quenched state
โข Must be tempered to gain usable toughness
Ms temperature depends on: carbon content and alloying. More C/alloy โ lower Ms โ risk of retained austenite (untransformed austenite trapped at room temperature).
Upper bainite (350-540ยฐC): feathery, moderate strength, limited toughness
Lower bainite (250-350ยฐC): acicular, high strength + good toughness โ often better than tempered martensite!
Austempering: quench to bainite range and hold โ all austenite transforms to bainite. Advantages: no quench cracks, less distortion, good strength+toughness without tempering.
ADI (Austempered Ductile Iron): same principle applied to ductile cast iron โ transforms to "ausferrite" โ exceptional properties for castings.
How metal freezes determines casting quality: porosity, segregation, dendrite arm spacing, and grain structure.
SDAS (Secondary Dendrite Arm Spacing): the key quality metric.
โข Smaller SDAS โ faster cooling โ better mechanical properties
โข Typical: sand cast 50-200ฮผm, permanent mold 20-50ฮผm, die cast 5-15ฮผm
Between the dendrite arms: last liquid to solidify โ enriched in solute โ micro-segregation โ potential porosity, hot tearing, and property variation.
Gas porosity: dissolved gas (Hโ in Al, Nโ in steel) comes out of solution during solidification โ round pores. Solution: degassing, vacuum casting.
Hot tearing: semi-solid metal pulled apart by thermal contraction before fully solid. Solution: avoid sharp corners, add fillets, adjust alloy composition.
Segregation: macro (center of ingot enriched) and micro (between dendrites). Homogenization anneal can fix micro, not macro.
A fracture surface tells the story of how a part failed โ the loading type, the material condition, and where the crack started. This is the detective work of metallurgy.
Visual clues:
โข Gray, fibrous, "torn" appearance
โข Significant plastic deformation (necking) before fracture
โข Cup-and-cone fracture in tension specimens
โข 45ยฐ shear lips at edges
Under SEM: dimples (micro-void coalescence) โ the classic sign. Dimple shape indicates loading: equiaxed = tension, elongated = shear.
Meaning: the material absorbed energy before failing. The part was not operating far above its design capacity โ it gave warning before breaking.
Visual clues:
โข Bright, shiny, crystalline, flat surface
โข Chevron marks (V-patterns) pointing back to origin
โข Little or no plastic deformation
โข No necking, no shear lips
Under SEM: cleavage facets (flat, smooth, with river marks) โ trans-granular brittle fracture. Or smooth grain-boundary facets โ inter-granular brittle fracture (corrosion, temper embrittlement, hydrogen).
Meaning: catastrophic. The material had no capacity to absorb energy. Causes: wrong material, operating below DBTT, hydrogen embrittlement, temper embrittlement.
Visual clues:
โข Beach marks (clamshell marks) โ concentric arcs radiating from origin. Each mark represents a period of crack growth.
โข Smooth initiation zone + rough final fracture zone
โข Origin almost always at a stress concentrator: fillet, keyway, corrosion pit, machining mark
Under SEM: striations โ microscopic lines, each one = one load cycle.
Key insight: beach marks tell you the crack was growing for a long time before final failure. NDT inspection at the right interval could have caught it.
Visual clues:
โข Intergranular (along grain boundaries) cracks and voids
โข Grain boundary sliding visible under microscope
โข Elongated, necked appearance in creep rupture
โข Oxide scale on fracture surface (exposed at high temp for a long time)
Meaning: the part was operating above ~0.4รTm (absolute melting point) under sustained stress. Turbine blades, boiler tubes, furnace components.
When a part fails in service, the metallurgical investigation follows a structured process to find the root cause and prevent recurrence.
2. Collect history โ service conditions, loading, time in service, maintenance records, similar failures.
3. Visual/macro examination โ fracture origin, crack path, deformation, corrosion products.
4. Non-destructive testing โ MPI/PT for other cracks, UT for internal defects.
5. Fractography (SEM) โ ductile vs brittle, fatigue striations, intergranular/transgranular.
6. Metallography โ cross-section, microstructure, grain size, inclusions, decarburization.
7. Chemical analysis โ OES/XRF verify correct alloy. EDS on fracture surface for contaminants (Cl, S, P).
8. Mechanical testing โ hardness profile, tensile test from adjacent material if available.
| Symptom | Likely cause |
|---|---|
| Intergranular + Cl on surface | SCC (stress corrosion cracking) |
| Intergranular + recent plating | Hydrogen embrittlement |
| Beach marks from keyway | Fatigue โ stress concentration |
| Cleavage at low temp | DBTT โ wrong material selection |
| Soft core, hard case, crack at interface | Case hardening too deep |
| Decarburized surface + fatigue | Heat treatment atmosphere |
| Large grain + low hardness | Over-soaking / wrong temperature |
Susceptible materials: high-strength steel (>1000 MPa / >32 HRC), especially martensitic.
Sources of hydrogen:
โข Electroplating (especially Cd, Zn, hard Cr) โ MOST COMMON
โข Welding (moisture in electrode coating)
โข Pickling / acid cleaning
โข Service environment (sour gas / HโS)
Prevention: bake out within 4 hours after plating (190ยฐC, 8-24h per ASTM B849). Pre-plate stress relief. Material substitution below 32 HRC for critical parts.
What the microstructure tells you:
โข Pearlite spacing: fine = faster cooling (normalized), coarse = slow (annealed)
โข Prior austenite grain size: reveals heat treatment temperature
โข Decarburization: ferrite layer at surface = furnace atmosphere problem
โข Banding: alternating layers of ferrite/pearlite = segregation from casting
โข Inclusions: MnS (elongated, gray), AlโOโ (angular, dark) โ stress risers for fatigue
Standard: ASTM E3 (preparation), ASTM E407 (etching), ASTM E112 (grain size).